Disney hires most of Character.AI's staff and bids for its tech through bankruptcy
Character.AI filed for chapter 11 on October 12 as part of a deal in which Disney hired most staff and seeks a technology license, while the startup keeps its lawsuits and liabilities.

In context
- 01Character.AI filed for chapter 11 on October 12; filings say Disney required the deal to be fully consummated through bankruptcy because of dwindling cash and litigation and regulatory risks.
- 02In September Disney paid $5.5 million plus a refundable $2 million deposit, and hired the majority of staff, including CEO Karandeep Anand, now Disney's first CTO.
- 03Disney would pay a further $12.5 million at closing for a perpetual, worldwide, nonexclusive license to code, tools and trust and safety technology. User data and the website are excluded.
- 04Disney's bid is a stalking horse, so another bidder could top it. Filings say Disney will make offers to at least 60 employees, with an estimated $60 million in annual pay.
- 05A proposed court order would state the deal is not a merger and that Character.AI keeps responsibility for all legal claims against it.
What happened
Character.AI filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy on October 12, and court filings show the move was part of a two-stage deal with Disney. Disney has hired most of the startup's employees, including former CEO Karandeep Anand, who has become Disney's first chief technology officer. Disney is also seeking a license to much of Character.AI's technology, while the company left behind keeps its legal liabilities.
The first transaction took place in September. Disney paid Character.AI $5.5 million plus a refundable $2 million good faith deposit, hired the majority of its employees, and agreed to let some of those staff help keep Character.AI running for five months. A filing spotted by Bloomberg says Disney will make offers to at least 60 employees, at an estimated $60 million in annual compensation, and that the vast majority of those offered jobs accepted.
The second stage runs through bankruptcy. Disney wants a perpetual, worldwide, nonexclusive license to code, documentation, frameworks and tools, including the trust and safety moderation stack, training infrastructure and age-prediction technology. User data and the website are not on the list. If Disney wins the auction and courts approve, it will pay an extra $12.5 million at closing. If not, it gets its deposit back and a breakup fee.
Why it matters
Character.AI has faced private lawsuits over the safety of its chatbots, including claims that bots encouraged minors to self-harm, as well as investigations by regulators and a group of states. Its new CEO said in a declaration that bankruptcy aims at a consensual resolution with injury claimants and the states. Disney's proposed order would say the transaction is not a merger and that Character.AI stays responsible for any liability.
“There’s decades of corporate law that developed to deal with the problem of a buyer who always wants to take on all the assets and never wants to take on any of the liability”
Ars Technica describes the structure as a variation on the reverse acquihire, in which a buyer takes the people and a broad technology license and leaves a shell behind. Such deals have grown common in AI, as with Google's 2024 arrangement with Character.AI. John Newman, a law professor and former FTC competition official, calls the deal extremely unusual and says corporate law safeguards were not built for it.
Experts quoted by Ars also doubt that employees could realistically move to another company within months, and say the arrangement cannot easily be unwound. Disney declined to comment, and Character.AI referred questions to the court docket.
What to watch
The main open question is whether another bidder emerges, since Disney's offer is a stalking horse bid. The winning bidder may interview and potentially offer jobs to up to 80 percent of certain newly hired employees, with Disney choosing which ones.
Also to watch is whether the court approves the proposed order clearing the sale of liabilities, and how it treats the claims of injured users and the states.
Sources
This briefing was written by Claude from the sources above. Check the original reporting before relying on it.